Coresignal Alternative, Benchmark Verified

Coresignal vs CompanyEnrich

Looking for a Coresignal alternative for people search and company enrichment? CompanyEnrich gives you a lower cost per record, higher company enrichment and people search coverage, deeper company profiles, and a Company Lookalikes API Coresignal does not offer.

Comparison data last verified September 18, 2026

Higher find rate
67.6%
349-domain benchmark
Coresignal: 50.4%
Lower cost per record
$0.01
Starting cost per company record
Coresignal: ~$0.20
More people coverage
+20%
Verified in public benchmark
86.7% vs Coresignal 72.5%
API Coresignal lacks
1 API
Company Lookalikes
Coresignal: not offered

How does Coresignal compare to CompanyEnrich?

Core APIs, unique workflows, pricing, and benchmark results in one view.

CompanyEnrichCoresignal
Shared API surface
Company Enrichment✓Multiple endpoints, pricing varies
People Enrichment✓✓
Company Search✓✓
People Search✓✓
Headcount data✓Higher-tier plans
Jobs API✓✓
MCP support✓✓
CompanyEnrich-only workflow
Company Lookalikes API
Find similar companies from a domain
✓×
Coresignal-only workflow
Datasets×✓
Pricing & limits
Starting cost per company record
Cheapest self-serve plan
From ~$0.01 (1 credit)From ~$0.20 (10–20 credits)
Search exclusion list sizeUp to 50,000×
Company enrichment benchmark View full benchmark
Domain enrichment find rate67.6%50.4%
Avg fields returned per profile17.9 / 2714.2 / 27
Core identity category67.6%48.1%
Socials category34.5%13.7%
Technology fields60.2%29.8%
Location coverage61.6%44.7%
Phone coverage53.9%21.8%
People search benchmark View full benchmark
Companies with a correct CEO or founder
502 active YC companies
88.0% (442)77.7% (390)
Correct CEOs and founders found
Out of 933 verified CEOs & founders found across 7 providers
86.7% (809)72.5% (676)
Unique correct finds
Correct people no other tested provider found
31
Cost per correct person
Modeled from ~$500 plan tiers
$0.0027$0.1475

Pricing and feature references checked September 2026. People search results come from CompanyEnrich's self-published August 31, 2026 benchmark.

Why do teams choose CompanyEnrich over Coresignal?

The strongest reasons to choose CompanyEnrich when people search and company enrichment matter most.

01, Find rate
+17.2pts
vs Coresignal

More companies enriched, cleaner records returned

More matched companies means fewer blank rows in your CRM, scoring models, and product features. A cleanup-first pipeline filters, normalizes, and removes noisy records before they reach scoring, routing, or personalization.

"Was able to find companies no other data provider was able to find."
Alexander T. · Founder & CEO, Small Business, G2 review
02, People search
+52
companies resolved

More decision-makers found

Reach the person who makes the call at more of your target accounts. Fewer empty searches means less manual research and fewer accounts stuck without a contact.

See the people search benchmark
03, Cost per record
20×
per company record

Lower cost to test and scale

A company record costs one credit, not ten or more. Test coverage on large lists without a big upfront commitment, then scale product enrichment and repeatable GTM workflows without renegotiating.

"Data is accurate and the API is fast, with great pricing."
Floris J. · CEO, Small Business, G2 review
04, Data depth
17.9/27
Coresignal: 14.2 / 27

Better social, tech stack, location, and phone coverage

More social, tech stack, location, and phone fields per company give you routing, segmentation, scoring, and personalization-ready records without stitching together a second source.

"Company information is very accurate."
Iggy F. · Co-Founder & GTM Engineer, G2 review
05, Missing API
1 API
Coresignal lacks

Company Lookalikes API

CompanyEnrich lets you submit a company domain and get similar accounts back. That gives GTM teams a direct way to expand from best customers, competitor customers, closed-won accounts, and niche ICP examples without building a manual matching model.

"Domain lookalike feature is the number one most beneficial thing."
Tyler M. · Co-Founder, Small Business, G2 review

What do CompanyEnrich reviewers call out?

The most repeated review themes map directly to this comparison: lookalikes, data quality, accuracy, pricing, support, and fast API workflows.

★★★★★
"Domain lookalike feature is the number one most beneficial thing."
Tyler M. · Co-Founder, Small Business
★★★★★
"Data is accurate and the API is fast."
Floris J. · CEO, Small Business
★★★★★
"Customer support is exceptional."
Christian L. · Co-founder
★★★★★
"Company information is very accurate."
Iggy F. · Co-Founder & GTM Engineer
★★★★★
"Super easy to use. Data is top-notch."
Alexander T. · Founder & CEO, Small Business
★★★★★
"Pricing is very fair."
Indrek L. · Founder, Small Business

CompanyEnrich review excerpts sourced from G2.com. Read more on G2.

Honest take

When is Coresignal still the right call?

We're not the right fit for every workflow. If these are your core requirements, Coresignal may be the better fit.

Coresignal leads

Dataset-oriented jobs workflows

If the workflow depends on offline jobs datasets, historical feeds, or broader dataset delivery, Coresignal may be closer to that buying motion.

Coresignal leads

Datasets

If you need offline datasets instead of live API enrichment, Coresignal is closer to that buying motion.

If your day-to-day workflow is enriching companies, searching for accounts, discovering lookalikes, filtering by social or technology signals, or powering AI agents with live data, CompanyEnrich is the more focused choice.

Coresignal vs CompanyEnrich FAQs

Is CompanyEnrich a Coresignal alternative?
Yes, when the workflow is company enrichment, people enrichment, company search, people search, Jobs API workflows, headcount data, or MCP-enabled enrichment. If your core requirement is offline datasets or historical feed delivery, Coresignal may still be a better fit.
Can I migrate from Coresignal to CompanyEnrich?
Yes, for live API workflows. Company enrichment and search, employee (people) enrichment and search, Jobs, headcount data, and MCP all have direct CompanyEnrich equivalents, drawn from one credit pool. Offline datasets and historical feed delivery don't have a CompanyEnrich equivalent today. Talk to our engineers to map your current endpoints and fields before you switch.
What does CompanyEnrich offer that Coresignal doesn't?
CompanyEnrich offers a Company Lookalikes API and search exclusions up to 50,000 accounts. Those are built for teams that need to expand from known-fit accounts and avoid re-surfacing companies they have already processed.
How does CompanyEnrich's pricing compare to Coresignal's?
A CompanyEnrich company enrichment call costs 1 credit, from about $0.01 per record. Coresignal credits start around $0.02 on its cheapest self-serve plan, but a company or employee record costs 10–20 credits, so a record starts around $0.20. CompanyEnrich uses one credit pool across every endpoint.
How did CompanyEnrich perform against Coresignal in the benchmark?
On 349 real DNS-resolved domains, CompanyEnrich had a 67.6% find rate versus Coresignal's 50.4%. CompanyEnrich also averaged 17.9 fields per returned profile versus Coresignal's 14.2, and led on social coverage, technology fields, location coverage, and phone coverage. Read the full benchmark for the methodology.
Which is better for people search, Coresignal or CompanyEnrich?
In our self-published August 2026 benchmark, both APIs searched for current CEOs and founders at 502 active YC companies. CompanyEnrich resolved 442 companies and found 809 correct people. Coresignal resolved 390 and found 676. At roughly comparable $500 plan tiers, our modeled cost per correct person was $0.0027 for CompanyEnrich and $0.1475 for Coresignal. Coresignal returned fewer wrong profiles (31 vs 49) and fewer stale profiles (5 vs 27). Results cover one startup cohort and one title task. Read the full methodology.
Does CompanyEnrich have a Jobs API or datasets?
Yes. CompanyEnrich offers a Jobs API for active job postings and hiring signals. Coresignal is still the better fit if offline datasets or historical feed delivery are the primary reason you are buying.
How does headcount data compare?
CompanyEnrich includes Company Headcount API as part of its API suite. Coresignal's Historical Headcount API is available on its higher-tier plans, so CompanyEnrich is the more direct option if headcount access matters.
Do both products support MCP?
Yes. Both are listed with MCP support in this comparison. The difference is what the MCP layer can call: CompanyEnrich pairs MCP with enrichment, search, lookalike discovery, social data, technology fields, location, phone, and headcount workflows.

Tell us what you're building

Every integration is unique. Whether you're enriching CRM data, powering AI agents, or automating lead generation — we'll show you exactly how our API fits.

Technical questions?

Our engineers will join the call.

Pricing concerns?

We'll design a plan that scales with you.

Integration help?

Walk away with working code samples.

Amirali, Co-Founder Amirali, Co-Founder
Zeynep, Partnership Manager Zeynep, Partnership Manager
Ekin, Co-Founder & CTO Ekin, Co-Founder & CTO
CompanyEnrich CompanyEnrich

Get answers, not a sales pitch

Talk to an expert