Crustdata vs CompanyEnrich
Looking for a Crustdata alternative for live enrichment and account discovery? CompanyEnrich gives you lower credit costs, a higher benchmark find rate, deeper company profiles, and APIs Crustdata does not offer.
Side-by-side comparison
Core APIs, unique workflows, pricing, and benchmark results in one view.
 | Crustdata | |
|---|---|---|
| Shared API surface | ||
| Company Enrichment | ✓ | ✓ |
| People Enrichment | ✓ | ✓ |
| Company Search | ✓ | ✓ |
| People Search | ✓ | ✓ |
| Headcount data | ✓ | ✓ |
| MCP support | ✓ | ✓ |
| CompanyEnrich-only workflows | ||
Semantic Search API Plain-English company discovery | ✓ | × |
Company Lookalikes API Find similar companies from a domain | ✓ | × |
Preview API Test preview results without charging credits | ✓ | × |
| Crustdata-only workflows | ||
| Job listings | × | ✓ |
| Hiring signals | × | ✓ |
| Watcher API | × | ✓ |
| Datasets | × | ✓ |
| Pricing & limits | ||
| Starting credit cost | Starts from $0.01 / credit | Starts from $0.30 / credit |
| Search exclusion list size | Up to 50,000 | × |
| Public benchmark View full benchmark | ||
| Domain enrichment find rate | 67.6% | 50.1% |
| Avg fields returned per profile | 17.9 / 27 | 13.0 / 27 |
| Core identity category | 67.6% | 30.1% |
| Revenue coverage | 37.0% | 45.6% |
| Crunchbase URL coverage | 7.4% | 35.2% |
| Taxonomy category | 50.5% | 15.7% |
| Technology fields | 60.2% | 0.0% |
Pricing and feature references reflect comparison inputs available in May 2026. Benchmark figures come from the public Company Enrichment API benchmark.
Why teams choose CompanyEnrich
The strongest reasons to choose CompanyEnrich when enrichment and account discovery matter most.
More domains enriched, cleaner records returned
CompanyEnrich enriched 236 of 349 DNS-resolved domains in the public benchmark. Crustdata enriched 175. CompanyEnrich pairs that find rate with a cleanup-first data pipeline that filters, normalizes, and removes noisy records before enrichment output powers scoring, routing, personalization, or product features.
"Was able to find companies no other data provider was able to find."
Lower cost to test and scale
CompanyEnrich starts at $0.01 per credit versus Crustdata's $0.30 starting credit cost. That gap matters when you test coverage on large lists, enrich product data, or run repeatable GTM workflows.
"Pricing is very fair."
Detailed taxonomy, socials, and tech stack
CompanyEnrich led the benchmark's taxonomy category and returned technology fields on 60.2% of submitted domains. It also gives GTM and product teams richer social profile matching and a wider account profile.
"B2B/B2C/SaaS categorization" is Oleg T.'s top feature.
Semantic Search, Lookalikes, and Preview API
CompanyEnrich lets you describe a market in plain English, submit a company domain to find similar accounts, and preview likely enrichment results before spending credits.
"Domain lookalike feature is the number one most beneficial thing."
What CompanyEnrich reviewers call out
The most repeated review themes map directly to this comparison: lookalikes, semantic search, data quality, taxonomy, pricing, and support.
"Domain lookalike feature is the number one most beneficial thing."
"Data is accurate and the API is fast."
"Customer support is exceptional."
"Lookalike / semantic search algorithm is very precise."
"Super easy to use. Data is top-notch."
"Semantic search helps a lot, best option tried in the industry."
CompanyEnrich review excerpts sourced from G2.com. Read more on G2.
When Crustdata is still the right call
We're not the right fit for every workflow. If these are your core requirements, Crustdata may be the better fit.
Job listings
If the workflow starts from open roles and job-posting data, Crustdata has a purpose-built surface.
Hiring signals
Teams that prioritize hiring changes over enrichment depth should evaluate Crustdata first.
Watcher API
If your product depends on watching companies for changes, Crustdata's Watcher API is the more direct match.
Datasets
If you need offline datasets instead of live API enrichment, Crustdata is closer to that buying motion.
If your day-to-day workflow is enriching companies, searching for accounts, discovering lookalikes, filtering by taxonomy, or powering AI agents with live data, CompanyEnrich is the more focused choice.
Benchmark results on real domains
We tested six enrichment providers on the same 349 DNS-resolved Majestic Million domains.
CompanyEnrich vs Crustdata on 349 domains
CompanyEnrich had the highest find rate and the deepest returned profiles. Crustdata's best signals were revenue coverage, follower count, Crunchbase, X/Twitter, and limited funding signals.
Read the full benchmarkCrustdata vs CompanyEnrich FAQs
Is CompanyEnrich a Crustdata alternative?
What does CompanyEnrich offer that Crustdata doesn't?
How does CompanyEnrich's pricing compare to Crustdata's?
How did CompanyEnrich perform against Crustdata in the benchmark?
Does CompanyEnrich have job listings or hiring signals?
Can I test enrichment coverage before spending credits?
Do both products support MCP?
Tell us what you're building
Every integration is unique. Whether you're enriching CRM data, powering AI agents, or automating lead generation — we'll show you exactly how our API fits.
Technical questions?
Our engineers will join the call.
Pricing concerns?
We'll design a plan that scales with you.
Integration help?
Walk away with working code samples.
Amirali, Co-Founder
Zeynep, Partnership Manager
Ekin, Co-Founder & CTO
CompanyEnrichGet answers, not a sales pitch
Talk to an expert